
Kenjo
Founder
When it comes to pay-per-click (PPC) advertising, Google Ads is the dominant player – but Microsoft Ads (formerly Bing Ads) offers unique benefits that are often overlooked. Google’s search engine commands about 94% of the market in Australia (roughly 4.7% for Bing), meaning Melbourne businesses will find the largest audience on Google. However, Microsoft Advertising reaches a different segment of users and can deliver strong results with lower costs under the right conditions. Below we compare the two platforms on targeting capabilities, cost-effectiveness, audience reach, industry performance, ROI, and more – with a special focus on what this means for businesses in Melbourne.
With its overwhelming market share, Google provides access to the broadest possible audience. Globally, Google accounts for around 91–94% of all search queries. In Australia (including Melbourne), Google maintains roughly 94% share of searches. This translates to millions of potential impressions and clicks. Google’s user base skews very broad and diverse, covering all ages and demographics, though generally leaning younger and tech-savvy.
Microsoft Advertising covers search on Bing, Yahoo, AOL, and partner sites through one platform. While smaller, it still reaches a significant unique audience – an estimated 63 million search users that Google Ads doesn’t reach. On desktop devices, Bing’s global search share is around 9–17%, whereas on mobile it’s under 2%. This indicates Microsoft Ads’ strength is largely on desktop searches, which is important for certain industries and B2B markets. Microsoft’s audience also has a distinctive demographic profile: nearly 46% of Bing users are over 45 years old, significantly older than the internet average. Moreover, 36% of Microsoft’s search users are in the top income quartile, and a large portion are homeowners with families. In short, Microsoft Ads can connect you with an older, more affluent user base that might not be as active on Google.
For Melbourne businesses, this means Microsoft Ads can help expand your reach to a niche but potentially valuable audience. While the volume of searches in Melbourne on Bing/Yahoo is relatively small (only a few percent of total searches), those users may have higher purchase power or specific profiles worth targeting. If your target customers include professionals, older consumers, or Windows PC users, Microsoft’s network could be an effective supplement to Google’s vast reach.
Both Google and Microsoft offer robust targeting options for PPC campaigns, but Microsoft Ads provides unique targeting features that give it an edge in certain scenarios.
On both platforms you can target by keywords, location (e.g. Melbourne or specific suburbs), time of day, device type, demographics (age, gender, etc.), and audience segments (such as remarketing lists or custom audiences). Google Ads has very granular targeting including detailed affinities, in-market audiences, and life events – effectively a “Swiss Army knife” of targeting options. Microsoft has been catching up in offering similar targeting categories (in-market, remarketing, etc.).
A standout feature exclusive to Microsoft Advertising is the integration with LinkedIn data. Microsoft Ads allows you to target users based on their LinkedIn profile — for example, by industry, company, or job title. This means a Melbourne B2B company could serve ads specifically to “IT managers in finance companies” or other professional segments. Google Ads does not offer direct LinkedIn targeting, giving Microsoft a competitive edge for B2B marketers. Experts highlight this LinkedIn integration as a “unique edge, especially for B2B businesses”, allowing extremely precise professional targeting.
Google’s ads can appear on Google Search, Google’s Search Partners, and the extensive Google Display Network. Microsoft’s search ads appear on Bing, plus partner search engines like Yahoo and AOL (due to a deal where Bing powers Yahoo’s search ads). This multi-platform presence means your Microsoft Ads keywords can surface across several search engines at once, expanding reach beyond just Bing’s own users. For example, if someone in Melbourne searches via Yahoo, they’ll see ads from Microsoft Advertising.
Both platforms offer similar ad formats (text ads, shopping/product ads, responsive ads) and extensions (sitelinks, callouts, location extensions, etc.). Microsoft often mirrors Google’s features, so advertisers can reuse strategies. In some cases Microsoft has unique extensions – for instance, Action Extensions on Microsoft Ads can add a call-to-action button in your ad, which has been shown to boost click-through-rates in testing. Overall, any targeting or ad format you’re used to on Google will have an equivalent on Microsoft, making it easy to import campaigns.
Google Ads provides more advanced audience types and huge reach for targeting, but Microsoft Ads offers specialized targeting (LinkedIn profile filters) and covers additional search partner sites. For Melbourne businesses that need to reach specific professional demographics or want to appear on all search platforms used by Aussies, Microsoft’s targeting toolkit can complement Google’s capabilities.
A major advantage of Microsoft Ads is its lower competition, which often leads to lower costs per click. Fewer advertisers bid on Bing’s keywords compared to Google, so the auction prices tend to be less inflated. Studies consistently find that Microsoft Advertising clicks are cheaper:
It’s worth noting that while clicks are cheaper on Bing, the limited volume means you might not spend large amounts even if you want to. One PPC expert notes that even though Microsoft Advertising can technically reach ~25% of searches in the U.S., in practice many advertisers find they can only spend about 10% of what they spend on Google because of lower search volume and demand. For Melbourne, a smaller market, this could be an even lower proportion. In short, Microsoft Ads is cost-effective on a per-click basis, but it’s a supplement to Google rather than a full replacement if you need large scale. Most Melbourne businesses will find Google can absorb the bulk of their ad budget, with Microsoft being a great way to capture additional cheap clicks once Google is tapped out.
Cost per click is only half the equation – we also need to look at how well those clicks convert into customers. Google’s massive reach and data advantage often translate into higher overall conversion rates. A broad 2024 analysis showed the average conversion rate on Google Ads is ~3.75% vs 2.94% on Microsoft Ads. That implies Google clicks tend to convert ~27% more frequently in general. Similarly, Google’s click-through rate (CTR) tends to be a bit higher (e.g. 3.17% vs 2.83% in one benchmark), indicating Google ads may attract clicks slightly more effectively on average. These factors mean that Google often delivers more conversions from the same number of impressions.
However, conversion performance for Microsoft Ads can vary widely by industry and intent. In some cases, Microsoft’s audience and lower competition lead to equal or better ROI despite the smaller traffic. Key points to consider:
Because Microsoft’s CPCs are lower, advertisers can achieve a strong return on ad spend (ROAS) if the conversion rate is even reasonably close to Google’s. Many businesses report comparable or higher ROI on Microsoft Ads campaigns when targeting the right niche. “Microsoft Ads gets often overlooked, yet it offers significant advantages in cost-effectiveness… The lower competition often results in a lower CPC, making it attractive for businesses with tighter budgets,” notes one digital marketing expert. Essentially, you spend less per click, and if those clicks convert decently, the ROI can be impressive. For instance, a marketer on one forum noted seeing 2-3x higher ROI on Bing for campaigns targeting older customers (since many of those users exclusively use Bing) – anecdotal, but illustrating the potential when audience and product fit is strong.
A real-world case study from a legal firm’s campaigns showed how adding Microsoft Ads boosted ROI. The firm copied their Google Ads search campaign to Microsoft Advertising. As expected, Microsoft delivered fewer conversions (3 vs 21 in the test period), but the cost per conversion was about 34% lower ($93 on Microsoft vs $140 on Google). In other words, they paid significantly less for each lead from Microsoft Ads. The reduced CPA improved their overall return, even though Google provided more total volume. This demonstrates that Microsoft Ads can capture low-hanging fruit – those extra few conversions at a much lower cost – thus improving efficiency.
Some advertisers do find that conversion rates on Microsoft can lag. The team at SpyFu, after running parallel campaigns, observed their conversion rate from Microsoft Ads was about 50% lower than on Google. They concluded that while Microsoft brought cheaper clicks, Google brought cheaper conversions overall in their case. This was partly due to Google’s ability to drive more phone call conversions and mobile users, where Microsoft’s presence is minimal. It’s a reminder that if your product relies on high volume or certain behaviors (like mobile app installs or younger audiences), Google might yield a better conversion rate and thus lower cost per acquisition despite higher CPC.
If your target audience aligns with Bing’s user base (and your landing pages resonate with them), the combination of lower CPC and less ad clutter can produce an excellent ROI – sometimes even better than Google’s. However, if Bing’s users don’t strongly match your customers, you might see lower conversion rates that negate the CPC advantage. The best approach for Melbourne businesses is to test Microsoft Ads alongside Google Ads and measure the cost per conversion. Many find that even a modest budget on Microsoft Ads yields incremental conversions at a favorable ROI, boosting overall campaign performance.
How Microsoft Ads performs relative to Google can depend on the industry and campaign type. Here are some insights on where Microsoft Advertising tends to shine versus where Google maintains an edge:
In summary, Microsoft Advertising performs best for industries and campaigns that align with its user demographics (older, affluent, professional) or where Google’s playing field is extremely competitive and costly. Melbourne businesses in B2B, high-value B2C services, finance, legal, and certain niches should strongly consider using Microsoft Ads in addition to Google. On the other hand, for mass-market products aimed at younger audiences or mobile app-driven services, Google will deliver far greater volume and may justify most of the budget.
To crystallize the comparison, here are the key competitive advantages Microsoft Ads offers relative to Google Ads:
Of course, Google Ads has its own considerable advantages (massive reach, more search data, YouTube and display network, etc.), and in many cases you will still allocate the majority of spend to Google. But the above points illustrate why Microsoft Ads can be a valuable addition to your digital marketing arsenal rather than a direct competitor to avoid. It’s about finding those complementary strengths – for instance, using Google to capture the bulk of searches and Microsoft to efficiently capture the remainder with higher precision and lower costs.
For businesses operating in Melbourne, the Google vs Microsoft Ads debate should be viewed in the context of the local market. Here’s how the comparison plays out specifically in Melbourne and Australia:
Australians overwhelmingly use Google, and Melburnians are no exception. With Google’s ~94% market share locally, any Melbourne SEO/SEM strategy will prioritize Google Ads to reach the broad consumer base. Microsoft’s Bing holds roughly 4–5% share in Australia (including Yahoo searches that Bing powers). While this is a small slice, consider that Melbourne has about 5 million residents – even 5% of searches represents a sizable number of potential customers. For example, if 100,000 people search for various services in Melbourne per month, Bing could account for ~5,000 of those searches. That’s 5,000 opportunities you could capture with relatively little competition.
Many Melbourne businesses compete heavily on Google Ads, driving up CPCs for popular local keywords (think “Melbourne restaurant”, “Melbourne plumber”, etc.). On Microsoft Ads, competition for the same keywords is likely sparse. This means your Melbourne-focused ads on Bing may achieve top positions at a fraction of the cost. If most competitors ignore Bing, it’s an opportunity for you to dominate that space. Lower CPC on Microsoft can be especially beneficial for local small businesses with tight marketing budgets. Every dollar saved on a click is money that can be reinvested elsewhere.
Both Google and Microsoft allow precise location targeting. You can target the entire Melbourne metro, specific suburbs (Mandaluyong was mentioned, which is actually in the Philippines; perhaps you meant Melbourne suburbs like Richmond, Carlton, etc.), or set radius targeting. Microsoft Ads also supports Australian postcode targeting similar to Google. One thing to watch: given Bing’s low mobile share, reaching on-the-go users (who often search for local shops or restaurants on their phones) might be tougher with Microsoft. Google’s integration with Google Maps and mobile is far superior for capturing those immediate “near me” searches. Thus, Microsoft Ads for Melbourne might work best for searches done on desktops or tablets – for example, someone at home or work searching for a local service provider.
Anecdotally, Melbourne-based businesses in professional services, finance, education, and B2B tech are well-positioned to leverage Microsoft Ads. These sectors cater to the demographics Bing serves well. If your business falls in this category, you might find that your conversion rates on Microsoft are on par or even better than on Google, since you’re reaching a more filtered audience (e.g., an IT firm advertising on Bing might get fewer clicks, but perhaps they’re from senior managers more ready to buy). On the other hand, if you’re a trendy new cafe targeting students, Google (and platforms like Instagram) would clearly be more effective to reach the younger crowd.
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) observed that despite new technology (like AI search) entering the scene, Bing hasn’t significantly eaten into Google’s dominance in Australia. This means as of 2025, Google is still the go-to for most Aussie consumers. Thus, Melbourne businesses should view Microsoft Ads as a complementary channel rather than expecting it to deliver the bulk of leads. In practice, many local advertisers allocate perhaps 10-15% of their search ad budget to Microsoft Ads (as some marketers report). This small investment can yield incremental gains without detracting much from Google efforts.
Microsoft Advertising is worth considering as part of a diversified PPC strategy. It can be highly cost-effective for reaching specific segments of Melbourne’s population (often older, professional, or niche audiences) and securing extra ROI from those users who aren’t on Google. The platform’s effectiveness will depend on your industry and target market in Melbourne. You may find it particularly useful once your Google Ads campaigns are mature and you’re looking for the next avenue to expand into without drastically increasing costs. By testing Microsoft Ads, Melbourne businesses can discover if there’s an untapped pocket of customers on Bing that delivers profitable returns.
Google Ads and Microsoft Ads each have their strengths, and a savvy Melbourne business can leverage both to maximize results. Google Ads offers unparalleled reach and generally higher average conversion rates thanks to the sheer volume and sophisticated targeting. Microsoft Ads, while smaller in audience, brings powerful competitive advantages like lower CPCs, unique LinkedIn-based targeting, and access to an under-targeted demographic. The data and cases show that Microsoft Ads can achieve a strong return on investment – in some instances outperforming Google in cost-per-conversion – especially for specific industries or audience segments.
For most businesses, this isn’t an “either/or” scenario. It’s wise to start with Google Ads to capture the bulk of demand, and then expand to Microsoft Ads to tap into additional searchers at a lower cost. By running both, you ensure your brand is visible wherever your potential customers search – be it on Google or Bing. Importantly, monitor performance metrics separately. You may notice, for example, that Microsoft Ads yields fewer but cheaper leads, while Google yields volume but at higher cost – allowing you to adjust budgets to balance volume and ROI.
In crafting your strategy, rely on the strengths of each platform: use Google’s dominance for scale and use Microsoft’s niches for efficiency and precision. A well-optimized Microsoft Ads campaign can become a secret weapon for Melbourne companies, capturing high-intent customers your competitors might be missing. Backed by statistical insights and expert advice, it’s clear that Microsoft Advertising is an effective, cost-conscious complement to Google Ads for those looking to maximize their PPC marketing impact in Melbourne.